Communications Essays - Celebrities in PR Campaigns

Use of celebrities in PR campaigns does more for celebrities and client egos than the brands in question.

Introduction

According to American Public Opinion Survey and Market Research, 72 % of customers who bought a product backed by a celebrity said that it was the famous face of the endorser who first grabbed their attention. More than a fifth of all advertising today features a famous face, voice, or image (Dahl, 2005).  With stars such as Britney Spears and Tiger Woods commanding endorsement fees of tens of millions of pounds, this paper will try to assess whether the selling-power of celebrity is an efficient marketing strategy or is it just another way for celebrities to increase their fame and fortune.

The business opportunity of celebrity

Dahl (2005) is not alone in believing that businesses and entrepreneurs who use celebrities to endorse there products are elevated into another category.  The celebrity pitch is a tried and tested advertising strategy that has stood the test of time.  The advantages are that celebrity adds personalities and characteristics to a brand that will raise awareness and product adoption (Mare, 2004).  If successful, the use of celebrity endorsers can contribute to adding significant value to a product.  Today, more than ever before, the public has a hunger for celebrity information. The cult of the celebrity is more powerful than at any time in history and the marketing potential of this is enormous, especially if you can connect a product and a celebrity to a specific demographic group.

Get Help With Your Essay

If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!

Essay Writing Service

Advocates of the use of celebrity endorsements to sell products will point to the frequently hailed increases in sales as a result of a celebrity’s appearance in promotional campaigns.  T-Mobile for instance claimed that the use of Catherine Zeta-Jones to promote their network in the United States increased sales by 25% – a massive margin.  However, there is no consensus that this strategy is successful.  Firstly, critics argue, using a celebrity face leaves you open to accusations of cheaply selling a product that does not sell itself and secondly, attaching your brand to an individual is a huge risk as any negative publicity regarding that individual will be immediately connected to your brand (Dahl, 2005).  This can create a long-term stigma that is difficult to overcome.  Martha Stewart’s cooking, house and home television network will probably never recover from her imprisonment for insider trading especially as her name formed part of the brand name.

Furthermore a celebrity should know about a product and preferably use it themselves so that they can endorse it beyond face value.  It helps if they believe in what they are selling.  Often they are contractually obliged to use the product which makes it especially damaging if they are caught using a rival brand.  For example, Britney Spears risked losing her $97 million endorsement deal with Pepsi when she was twice photographed drinking rival brand Coke.

The unquestionable power of celebrity

Having said that the use of celebrity endorsers dangerously attaches the fate of your brand to the personal life of the endorser, there is a saying that all publicity is good publicity and in this age of massive celebrity interest this is perhaps truer than ever.  Goziol (2005) gives a perfect example of this – “no one in recent memory has turned a bad public reputation into a marketing bonanza as effectively as did Paris Hilton, and now she is spreading her backward PR success to her mobile network” (p1).  

Goziol refers to the recent publicity that arose when Hilton had her mobile phone hacked into and her numbers stolen.  Rather than raise security scares that may harm sales, her network provider – T-Mobile – has subsequently been selling out of the Sidekick model of hand-set that Paris was revealed to use, “apparently, her unintentional endorsement of the unit is a more effective draw than the chilling realisation that one’s personal information might be exposed on a mobile network” (Goziol, 2005, p1).  If ever the impact of a celebrity endorser was in question, this incident provides marketers with extremely persuasive evidence that this strategy is an extremely powerful one to follow.

The costs of missing out on first mover advantage

A large problem with celebrity endorsers is that beyond their payment they usually have little incentive or interest in the success of their contribution to a promotional strategy.  Celebrity endorsers are attracted by the money and often the free publicity.  While a successful endorsement strategy can pay dividends (quite literally) for the celebrity, it is the amount of money that they receive that is most likely to interest them.  This is especially true of celebrities with multiple endorsement deals.  If they are receiving large amounts of money from a particular company the incentive to actively promote another company may be limited. 

Nike’s endorsement of Tiger Woods is an example of one brand dominating a celebrity.  His requirement to wear Nike clothing in all other endorsement campaigns somewhat undermines his other sponsors such as Buick, American Express of Tag Heuer watches.  Accenture recently produced a campaign of adverts at enormous cost in which Woods was photographed in various golf poses, the Nike logo on his cap was so prominent that the campaign served more to endorse Nike than it did Accenture (Kedrosky, 2005).

Psychological reasons for success

Celebrity sells but there has been little theory to help understand why this may be so.  Mucha (2005) believes that familiarity breeds friendship and trust.  Therefore the more we see celebrities the more we believe we can trust what they say and endorse – we’re designed to trust our friends.  This effect is known by Neuroscientists are the “mere exposure effect”.  The more we see the more we like.

Merely attaching a famous face to a product is not a guarantee of success and herein lies the biggest danger of using celebrities to endorse brands.  The products characteristics and the personality of the celebrity must be precisely matched and more importantly must appeal strongly to the specific demographic the brand is targeted at.  This is a biggest cause of failure in celebrity endorsed advertising campaigns, especially, as stated before, because the initial payment is usually the principle concern of the celebrity rather than the outcome of the campaign.  The difference between the endorser and the company employing them is that the celebrity will see any publicity as a bonus, the company sees it as essential.

To match a business with the right star a company must define the attributes that best suit their brands profile and target demographic. So, for example, Volvo could be associated with reliability or safety, while Porsche might be associated with speed and thrills.

Risks and flops

The Nike partnership with Tiger Woods and Michael ‘Air’ Jordan, and T-mobile with Catherine Zeta-Jones are examples of brands and celebrities in perfect harmony and achieving astonishing results in terms of sales, added value and popularity.  In such agreements, everybody benefits.  However, when sales do not increase or the brand is damaged arguably it is only the celebrity who benefits as they are either paid for it or, if doing it for a charity (e.g. Chris Martin from Coldplay),they get the moral status points (Lee-Potter, 2005).

Find Out How UKEssays.com Can Help You!

Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.

View our academic writing services

In short, celebrity endorsements are high risk, and sometimes things go wrong. Misbehavior is one obvious risk but as the Paris Hilton example showed this is not always the biggest risk.
More dangerous, however, is a basic failure to find complementary attributes between star and product. Chrysler paid $14 million to singer Celine Dion to front their 2003 advertising campaign, but consumers did not buy the intended match between Dion’s voice and image and Chrysler’s automotive sophistication. Sales suffered and the company ended up pulling the campaign (Hein and Benezra, 2005).

A potential failure was averted by appliance maker Salton after they had initially portrayed George Foreman as a boxer to sell their now famous George Foreman Grill. Initially sales lagged until the company focused on the attributes that matched with the lifestyle of those who would use the product: a barbecuing, funny dad to eight hungry kids. The value of this version of George Foreman that Salton paid the former boxer $138 million for long term rights to his name and likeness (Hein and Benezra, 2005).  This is a rare story of such a successful campaign.  The reality is that celebrity campaigns are unoriginal, commonplace and usually costly.  There is always one winner though – the celebrity.

Conclusion

The use of celebrities to sell products is not a new phenomenon but it remains in many cases an incredibly effective method of promoting and selling branded goods.  However, there are more risks in doing so now than ever before.  More and more products are using celebrities, celebrity behaviour is constantly in the spotlight and their negative actions that reflect badly on their endorsed products are more likely to be recorded than ever before.  Also, with the growth of reality TV and increase in sports coverage as two examples, the life-span of a celebrity is much shorter than it used to be.  However still the most damaging factor on the success of a celebrity endorsed brand is a poor connection between the associated image of the celebrity and the associated use or image of the product.  If this connection does not resonate with the public then the product will fail but the celebrity will always get paid.

Bibliography

Dahl, D (2005);The Celebrity Pitch; New York;  Inc; Vol. 27, Issue 4

Hein, K & Benezra, K (2005); Brands Left Starry Eyed; Brandweek; Vol. 26, Issue 9

Kedrosky, P (2005); Tiger, Tiger burning bright; Canadian Business; Vol. 27, Issue 6

Koziol, J (2005); We’ll Always Have Paris; Wireless Business Forecast; Vol. 13, No. 5

Lee-Potter, C (2005); Can celebrity endorsement save the planet?; New Statesman Vol. 134 Issue 4729

Mare, P (2004); Celebrity endorsement: pretty faces and ugly truths; Namibia Economist; www.economist.com.na – 11/04/05

Mucha, T (2005); Why the Caveman loves the Pitchman – A little celebrity and a shrewd marketing strategy can go a long way to sell a product. The key is understanding how the human brain really works; Business 2.0; Vol.6  Issue 3