INTRODUCTION
Bridges are structures related to planar factors that form a stable three-dimensional frame. Equilibrium of this body as assured by means of a bond to the ground through bearings, piers, abutments, and the bridge foundations. Consequently, bridges are spatial structures confined to external loads and movements and restricted in their movement through their support conditions. The calculation of the internal moments and forces is a critical step in qualifying the effects of the one of a kind actions from their factor of the application all the way down to the support. Concrete bridges are exacted to crack within the tensile and extreme deflection provinces, under heavy truckload situations and, consequently, the right reinforcement with great tensile strength material must be supplied. To this motive, the stress and deflection distribution of bridges on transverse and longitudinal direction should be decided. Although many research have been carried out to predict the live load distribution aspect of skewed bridges, only limited numbers focused on determining the maximum distribution of tensile and compressive stress, and deflection of skewed bridges.
Bridge Decks
Type of bridges
- Cable-Stayed bridge
- Suspension bridge
- Composite bridge
- Steel Truss bridge
- Reinforced Concrete bridge
- Steel Box Girder bridge
- Prestressed Concrete bridge
Deck Analysis
For decks with skew less than 25°, a simple unit strip approach of examination is typically good enough. For skews greater than 25° then a grillage or finite element method will be required for the examination. In Skew decks twisting moments will broaden in the slab. This grows to be greater considerable with higher skew angles. Automated system evaluation will return values for Mx, My and Mxy where Mxy outlines the twisting moment in the slab. due to the impact of this twisting moment, The slab's most cost-effective reinforcing way could be to install the reinforcing steel in the direction of the principal moments. These directions modify over the slab and directions have to be determined in which the reinforcing bars should lie. wood and Armor’s detailed equations of the moment of resistance to be provided in predetermined directions to resist the involved moments Mx, My and Mxy. Various steel arrangements significant check on have given the best positions as follows
Reinforced Concrete Decks
The common types of reinforced concrete bridge decks are classified in to three categories:
- Solid Slab reinforced concrete bridge deck
- Voided Slab Reinforced Concrete Bridge deck
- Solid Slab reinforced concrete bridge deck
Figure -Voided Slab Reinforced Concrete Bridge
Figure -Solid Slab reinforced concrete bridge
Figure -Beam and Slab reinforced concrete bridge
Get Help With Your Essay
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Prestressed Concrete Decks
Pre-tensioned Bridge Decks
Post-tensioned Bridge Decks
This is another kind of bridge desks which is called as Post-tensioned bridge decks commonly composed using concrete and ducts have been cast in the required positions.
Composite Decks
Composite Decks are kind of bridge decks which constructed using the composite construction normally related to the interaction using the reinforced concrete and structural steel.
Steel Box Girders
Steel Truss Decks
Cable Stayed Decks
Suspension Bridges
Suspension bridges are another type in which used bridge spans more than 350m. Numerous early suspension bridges have been designed without the sensitivity of wind effects. Large deflections have been formed in the flexible decks and wind loading formed weak oscillations. The problem changed into largely solved by using tilted hangers. The suspension bridge is a catenary cable prestressed through absolute weight. The cables are led over the support towers to ground anchors. The strengthened deck is supported particularly through vertical or inclined hooks.
Bridge Deck Comparisons
TYPE |
Advantage |
Disadvantage |
Concrete Deck |
Easily available material. Contains tolerances. Low cost. |
Sensitive to cracking and corrosion. |
Precast Concrete Deck |
Easily available material. Typically prestressed, Less chance of cracking. |
Assembly joint between components required, the initial cost is Expensive |
Metal Deck |
Lightweight system. Prefabricated system. |
It requires shielding coverings. Difficult tolerance adjustments. Expensive. . |
Timber Deck |
A lightweight system, Constructible with untrained workers. Low cost |
Limited span range. Sensitive to use without overlays. Sensitive to moisture degradation. |
The factors affecting life-span of bridge deck are Thermal expansion, Fatigue, overloads, Wear and abrasion
Methodology
In common, the method to compute site-specific bridge traffic loading consists of the following steps:
Traffic data collection: This presents the idea for the evaluation. It traditionally includes truck weight and axle information, and more recently vehicle acceleration and time headways, generally good enough for short-span bridges. however, reasonable premises need to be made during congestion, because of the shortage of congested traffic data.
Generation of a database: As the traffic data is generally not large good enough to identify the rare loading events used for bridge design and assessment, an extended garage of invented motors may be formed the usage of common Monte Carlo methods based on the recorded information.
Simulation of load effects: The traffic database is taken over a bridge and the essential load effects are calculated, for situation using influence principles or finite element analysis; if applicable, dynamic effects are also calculated
Extrapolation: As it may be still considerably computationally requiring to simulate traffic for very long intervals, load effects are moreover extrapolated to find appropriate values with the security level needed by the codes of practice. These values can be then compared to the resistance of similar members
Model calibration: When the objective is to develop a code to be implemented for a range of conditions, then a notional pressure model is found which envelopes the considered load effects. The calibration process often includes reliability examination to derive proper partial security factors
British Standard’s Traffic Load Models (HA and HB)
The first approved vehicle load for highway bridges in the UK was launched in 1922. There are many kinds of research carried on the permanence of highway bridges in conducting numerous traffic loadings as the initial source of stress on the structure. These traffic loads are analyzed in bridge examination and design according to the specific design code used in the country of practice. Type HA uniformly distributed loading represented typical traffic loads and HB represents heavy unusual loads. These have been replaced in the current Eurocode with HA modified to Load Model 1 and HB modified to Load Model 3. Nevertheless, for this assignment, we will be examining the outcomes of the British standard model.
Find Out How UKEssays.com Can Help You!
Our academic experts are ready and waiting to assist with any writing project you may have. From simple essay plans, through to full dissertations, you can guarantee we have a service perfectly matched to your needs.
View our academic writing services
Type HA Loading
The Type HA loading is the official design loading for Great Britain and adequately meets the effects of all allowed normal vehicles other than those used for unusual indivisible loads. In the Road Vehicles Regulations 1998 (Authorised Weight), pointed to as the AW Vehicles and cover vehicles up to 44-tonne gross vehicle weight. Loads from those AW vehicles are described by a Knife Edge Load and a Uniformly Distributed Load.
The loading has been enhanced to cover:
- overloading which means an excessive load.
- Impact load which means load applied with short duration.
- Lateral bunching which means that the width of a lane is occupying by more than one vehicle
The loaded length is associated with the quantity of the Uniformly Distributed Load as defined from the impact line for the member under consideration. For simply supported single span decks this usually associates to the span of the deck. Notational lane holding HA UDL +KEL load are shown below,
The Uniformly Distributed Load (W kN/m) is multiplied by a lane factor β to obtain the value to be implemented to each notional lane. If the Uniformly Distributed Load is claimed in kN/m2 then W will required to be divided by the notional lane width bL.
The knife-edge load referred to as KEL is also populated by the lane factor β. The knife-edge load may be placed anywhere along the loaded length to reach the worst effect in the member being considered. A single wheel load of 100 kN also needs to be examined as a choice to the Uniformly Distributed Load and knife-edge load as part of the HA loading design. The wheel load can produce more severe effects than the UDL+KEL on short span members.
Type HB Loading
The Type HB loading conditions determine from the nature of extraordinary loads mainly concerning industrial transportation possible to handle the roads in the area such as electrical transformers, generators, pressure vessels, machine presses, etc...
The vehicle load is specified by a four-axle carrier with four wheels equally aligned on each axle. The load on each axle is represented by several units which are dependent on the class of road and is specified in BD 37/01 Chapter 4 conditions. Motorways and trunk roads require 45 units, Principal roads require 37.5 units and other public roads require 30 units. One unit of HB is similar to 10kN per axle. There are five HB vehicles to check although most vehicles can be allowed by inspection. The spacing between the inner two axles of the vehicle has five different values which provide the range of HB wheels to consider. These are shown below
Figure – Type HB loading of one unit.
Only one HB vehicle is considered to load anyone superstructure. The vehicle is placed within one notional lane or balances two notional lanes to obtain the most consequential effect on the member. HA loading is placed in any remaining lane not occupied by the HB vehicle. Also, if the deck is long enough, the HA UDL only is placed in the lane occupied by the HB vehicle and also is prohibited from the length of lane within 25m from the front and back of the HB vehicle.
Design
The purpose of the design procedure is to analyse the bridge for HA and HB load effects applying the appropriate load factors. The member is then designed for the worst impacts of HA or HB loading.
REFERENCES
- Bridge Deck Behaviour by E.C. Hambly covers methods of analysis of various types of bridge decks.
- Eurocode Design Guides for Bridges
Cite This Work
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below: